24
Aug
09

It’s Not Sports, its Politics Stupid: (Jamaica’s Ascendancy in World Athletics)

Jamaican, Usain Bolt, fastest man in the world

Jamaican, Usain Bolt, fastest man in the world

The balance of power in world athletics has finally shifted. American dominance of the popular sport is well and truly over. Since August 1936 when American Jesse Owens accomplished athletics history by capturing four gold medals (100m, 200m, 4×1 relay and long jump) at the World Championships in Berlin, Germany, the American reign has been absolute and complete. No nation, large or small, resource rich or resource-poor could beat the American sprinters. Their triumphant intervention in the second World War had rendered the United States the new world super power. With no clear rivals except Communist Russia and the entire Soviet bloc, the post war years saw America becoming increasingly accustomed to domination and power and being a top of the world – militaristically, politically, economically, technologically and in terms of industrial and scientific development.

Sport was for America another avenue by which to display its skill and exhibit its superiority. Though there were glimpses of talent in other nations, none had managed to outshine and outperform America in track and field. America’s contingent at world games, including the Olympics, was always the largest, its medal haul the biggest and its place atop the world standings persistently secure. The world naturally basked in America’s glory and stood in awe of the constancy of their achievements. Jesse Owens became the marker of such success and later Carl Lewis, Marion Jones, Gail Devers and Michael Johnson – who helped to further and embed American domination in world athletics. Johnson himself set a world record in the 200m sprint of 19:32 secs, a time so outstanding that it was unsure whether it would ever be beat for a long time. But it has. Jesse Owens’ 1936 achievements – mighty and astounding as they were – remained the historical marker that no one could conquer. That is, until now.

Today, some 86 years later, a young 22 year old called Usain Bolt from the small island nation of Jamaica, has shattered all expectations. Usain Bolt bolted to victory in both the 100m (in world record time of 9.69 secs) and the 200m (19:30 secs) at the Beijing Olympics in 2008, and then breaking his own records in the 100 m (9.58 secs), and 200m (19.19 secs) at the famous Berlin stadium where Jessie Owens gained international prominence. Usain Bolt is now the first man in the history of world athletics to hold both the Olympic and World Championship records for the 100 and 200m simultaneously. Jesse Owen’s marker has not only been equalled. It is unquestionably surpassed. Owen’s 9.4 secs in the 100 yards, notwithstanding.

THE WINDS OF CHANGE FROM 1948 ONWARDS

Jamaica knew this day would one day come. The evidence has been continuously clear. At the London Games in 1948 and later in Helsinki in 1952, three black men from Jamaica – Herb McKinley, George Rhoden and Arthur Wint sprinted into athletic history. Although McKinley captured gold in the 4×4 relays in Helsinki in 1952, it was the persistent silver of second place, and bronze that became the precedent for this nation, especially at the Olympics.

Gold would come for the likes of Veronica Campbell- Brown and Asafa Powell in the contemporary area of sprinting but it was silver and bronze that occupied our cabinet. So embedded had Jamaica’s silver and bronze rush become that the popular Jamaican sprint Queen, Merlene Ottey, became known as the ‘Bronze Queen’. And there is little awe surrounding second place finishers. American domination meant that Jamaica – although present in every final at the world level- and medalling consistently, would never get the recognition it deserved from the global media and sport authorities. This was about to change. The tide had begun to change.

 At the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta, Jamaican Deon Hemmings hurdled her way to the country’s first gold medal in the 400m. What seemed impossible suddenly became a reality. Her victory would inspire a nation and set a mark for other athletes. Jamaica’s presence on the athletics track could no longer be ignored. Suddenly, it seemed that the black green and gold was everywhere. After Jamaica’s cracker of a performance at the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney Australia and later at the 2006 Commonwealth Games also in Sydney, the global media began to pay increased attention to this small Caribbean country inhabited by a mere 2.7 million people, and whose athletes had a rich tradition of sprinting, but for whom the gold rush had eluded for more than fifty years. Jamaica’s successful showing in world athletics had now become obvious and inescapable beyond the track. Many governments, developed and developing, had begun to take notice of this tiny 3rd world nation whose economy was in tatters, where crime mushroomed, whose size was negligible on the world map but whose sheer confidence and skill was rendering it a real competitive force beyond the sporting world. After all, sport was always a measure of a country’s stature in the world. It was therefore only natural that Jamaica’s increasing success on the track would begin to offend some in the political class of highly developed countries.

 WHEN POLITICS TRUMPS SPORTS: NEW ZEALAND DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER SNOBS JAMAICA AFTER COMMONWEALTH VICTORY

 During Jamaica’s dominance at the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne (Australia) in 2006, I was a student in New Zealand. In a tribute to the New Zealand athletes in the House of Parliament, then New Zealand’s Deputy Prime Minister, Michael Cullen remarked: “The only country to have done better than New Zealand is Jamaica, and given Jamaica’s crime rate, we would not want to swap places with them”. I could not believe my ears. A Commonwealth Head of State was failing to acknowledge the fortunes of a fellow member of the Commonwealth, choosing instead to undermine Jamaica’s achievement by remarking on the political performance of its government in the area of crime control. Jamaica’s ascendance was no longer about sport; it was now politics through and through.

The Third World ‘other’ was to be snubbed and relegated to consolidate the dominance and superiority of the First World. It was apparently difficult for this highly developed nation to accept that a Third World society – a kind of non-entity in the real world- battered by high crime and limited resources – could have produced such an abundance of talent, and excelled in such a marvellous and fundamental way – to capture world attention, while highly developed societies with robust economies were not achieving the kind of victories to match its status and stature in the world.

WHEN POLITICS TRUMPS SPORT: HILTLER SNOBS JESSE OWENS AT 1936 BERLIN GAMES?

This situation is not insignificant as way back in 1936 at the World Games in Berlin, Adolph Hitler was said to be using the Games to consolidate Germany’s resurgence as a world power. Germany indeed dominated the games with victories (toppeing the medal tally), and Hitler by this time was spreading German Nazism, which elevated the so-called Aryan people as a master race and while positioning people of African ethnicity as inferior. When the African-American Jesse Owens stunned the world by claiming four gold medals at these Berlin games, Hitler is reported to have avoided acknowledging his victories and refused to shake his hands (see Wikipedia, Jesse Owens). In his Memoirs, Inside the Third Reich, written and recollected by war armaments Minister, Albert Speer, it is noted that:

“Each of the German victories and there were a surprising number of these made Hitler happy, but he was highly annoyed by the series of triumphs by the marvellous coloured American runner, Jesse Owens. People whose antecedents came from the jungle were primitive, Hitler said with a shrug; their physiques were stronger than those of civilised whites and hence should be excluded from future games (Wikipedia, Jesse Owens)”.

Although Owens disagreed that he was snubbed by Hitler, instead declaring that he was snubbed by the American political class who failed to send him congratulatory messages, invite him to the White House or bestowed on him any honours – the above incidents are significant. They first speak volumes about the power of politics to intrude into the sporting arena. Secondly, Usain Bolt’s eclipse of various world records embeds Jamaica’s authority as the sprint kingdom and heralds this Caribbean nation’s supremacy in world athletics. At the same time, and even more significantly, it exposed the now weakened, inferior position of its main rival, the United States.

DRUG SCANDALS- FINAL NAIL IN THE COFFIN FOR AMERICAN ATHLETICS

Whereas Jamaica was finally gaining its rightful recognition in world athletics, a sport in which they had been participants for more than 60 years, drug scandals and disgrace was eating away at America’s dominance. Former Olympian, Marion Jones took home 5 medals at the 2000 Olympics in Sydney, including gold in the 100m sprint, only to be stripped of these medals when she admitted to using banned steroids. She was without a doubt the female Jessie Owens of her generation. Even so, America still had world class competitors of the likes of Alyson Felix, Jamaican-born Sanya Richards, Muna Lee as well as a long list of powerful male sprinters such as the popular Tyson Gaye, who continued to stamp their class on the sport.

But Gaye’s celebrated squeaky-clean image cannot repair the damage already done. With drugs out of the way, the true champions – Jamaica – had emerged – and they were from a society that was no match for America’s size, political clout or standing in the world. Their track emissaries did not veil their envy and dismay. American sprinter, Michael Johnson, though rendered speechless when Usain Bolt broke his own 100m record in Berlin, refused to acknowledge that Bolt had surpassed Jesse Owens. Johnson had prior to this lauded praise on  Bolt but in this moment still relegated to to second place. Owens is after all an American. It would be politically incorrect to admit that he has been surpassed. Even Jesse Owens may have marvelled at Bolt’s success.

For former American sprint great, Carl Lewis, it was ‘ridiculous’ that Jamaica was capable of taking over from America. In a 2009 article about Jamaica’s sprint victories, he declared:

“Are you kidding me? We’ve [America] dominated and then all of a sudden, one Olympics and these Jamaicans come along and run these crazy times and performances and all of a sudden everyone says now they are the fastest. It’s like everyone just lies down. Really it’s ridiculous. People need to get over it, go to work and stop whining.”

To admit that Bolt had become the greatest sprinter of all times, and to accept Jamaica’s new dominance in sprinting would be to acknowledge that America had finally been conquered and the American athletic reign had well and truly come to an end.

An Early Quaker missionary to Jamaica had observed that “Jamaica is destined to exert an influence upon humanity disproportionate to its territorial extent”. From Bob to Bolt, that influence is now undeniable.

_________________________________________

Dr. Hume Johnson holds a PhD in Political Science & Public Policy from the University of Waikato New Zealand. She teaches Journalism and Communications at James Cook University (Queensland, Australia). She can be reached at humepela@gmail.com


10 Responses to “It’s Not Sports, its Politics Stupid: (Jamaica’s Ascendancy in World Athletics)”


  1. August 25, 2009 at 2:53 pm

    Jamaica’s ascendancy in the sport is terrific. I would credit the success of the Jamaican team to developments on the administraton side of it. There are serious track clubs now and the success of the professional athletes are encouraging other young people to take track and field seriously which we have been good in from day one.

    I hope we will stay on top. This is the only thing we have managed well in years – that is sick.

  2. August 30, 2009 at 5:10 am

    Today, some 86 years later, a young 22 year old called Usain Bolt from the small island nation of Jamaica, has shattered all expectations. Usain Bolt bolted to victory in both the 100m (in world record time of 9.69 secs) and the 200m (19:30 secs) at the Beijing Olympics in 2008, and then breaking his own records in the 100 m (9.58 secs), and 200m (19.19 secs) at the famous Berlin stadium where Jessie Owens gained international prominence. Usain Bolt is now the first man in the history of world athletics to hold both the Olympic and World Championship records for the 100 and 200m simultaneously. Jesse Owen’s marker has not only been equalled. It is unquestionably surpassed. Owen’s 9.4 secs in the 100m, notwithstanding.

    I am trying to retrieve my previous comments. Let me know if you got it. I wrote my thoughts in poetry format. But I am surprised that Carl Lewis will make such unfortunate remark in regards to another youth’s accomplishments what if we did not support him as African ascendants when he competed as an African American he disappoints me an African Caribbean Canadian citizen. His remarks does not go upwards but downwards just as the were the observations of politically driven statements that came out of Germany, New Zealand. All world youths are setting goals that is all we must look at the big picture we come to starting point we are determined to finish first.
    copy right Geneva M. Neale (Audain) Award Poet who sets goals.
    I cheered for Carl Lewis so he better say good and not bad things about Usain Bolt 2009.

    • August 30, 2009 at 8:04 am

      Thanks for commenting Geneva

      Recall that Lewis is an American and when these games are occuring, the nation trumps the race. It is for these reasons why I said it is more than sport, it is also political (this infiltration of the American dominance in athletics by Jamaica).

      Thansk again for your comments. Feel free to visit by other blog at http://thecommunicationexperts.blogspot.com
      Hume

  3. 4 dbeth
    August 31, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    I am proud of my countrymen who have proven that you can be anything out of nothing…. a;l it takes is hard work. They have trained for years to get to this stage as world leaders in sprints. So for Carl Lewis to make such a nasty statement about us being leaders in sprint all of a sudden , all i have to say to him is You are pitied, and please “tek weh uself”. What you are seeing now is what we deserved long ago. Scratch all those American records that were drugs aided and you will find that we actually won tons of gold medals over the years. I am so proud of us and guess what…. the best is yet to come. As jamaicans would say…. oono nuh see nothing yet.

  4. September 1, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    Every person who responded to this review have made very good observations which means we are aware of errors that has occurred over the years I am ashamed of such disrespectful behavior of Carl Lewis. “The man in the mirror.” Michael Jackson.

  5. September 6, 2009 at 2:29 am

    Thanks for your article Dr. Hume Johnson.

    During the years, I have wondered just why our Jamaicans were always the runners-up. I was at Ullevi Stadium in Gothenburg during the 1995 World Championships in Track & Field when Merlene Ottey won the Gold after Gwen Torrence had been disqualified. That Gold was welcome, but that was not the way we wanted to win. Then after the fall of Communism and the exposures concerning the use of illegal substances in the Eastern European countries, followed by the dethroning of several of the American gold medalists, I came to realise that maybe our Jamaican athletes had always been the real winners, but they lost to those who cheated.

    So, finally we occupy the place that is rightfully and truly ours: the number one athletes of the world on the fast track. I am so happy and proud of our athletes. Also my husband, a Swede, basks in our sunshine and our Swedish friends are flabbergasted at the achievements of our tiny island.

    ****
    PS. Too bad I didn’t know about you, Dr. Hume Johnson, in July 2006, when I spent two weeks in NZ touring and lecturing in connection with my participation in the Select Committee Hearing on the proposed anti-smacking law.

    • September 6, 2009 at 9:24 am

      Thanks for commenting Ruby

      I have a few friends from Sweden myself from my years in New Zealand.

      I recall those anti-smacking debates very well, we discussed it quite a bit over morning tea when I was a Phd candidate in NZ. Good to meet you.

      Thanks again

      Hume

  6. 9 hope
    September 25, 2009 at 3:32 am

    Superpower in 2068 Olympics

    The Olympics is composed of a total of forty four (44) track and field events that account for 142 medals out of a total of 960 medals. In 2008 the US earned 23 (16%) of the total track and field medals. It was followed by Russia and Kenya which won 18 (13%) and 14 (10%) of the total track and field medals, respectively. Jamaica won 11 (8%) and was followed by Ethiopia that won 7 (5%) and Cuba that won 5 (3%) of the medals in track and field. The remaining 64 (45%) of the track and field medals were won by other nations.

    The United States is gradually loosing its edge in track and field events. Based on future projects and a wishful thinking, it appears that the United States could loose all medals in track and field by 2068, fifteen Olympics from now. As a result, it would only attain a total of 85 medals. If Jamaica were to win all track and field events that were won by the US in the 2008 Beijing Olympics, it would only attain a total of 34 (24%) of the total track and field medals. With such an achievement, Jamaica would still not be able to match or surpass the US performance in the Olympics.

    In order for that to goal to be achieved Jamaica shall have to gradually overtime increase its medals counts. Jamaica is to embark on a “Five Additional Medals Each Olympic” or shortly known as FAMEO program. Building on what was attained in the 2008 Olympics, Jamaica is to aim at achieving sixteen (16) medals in the 2012 Olympics. This is to be followed by twenty (20) medals in the 2016 Olympics and so on. At that rate, Jamaica shall achieve 86 medals in the 2068 Olympics and, therefore, surpass the number of medals anticipated by the US. It is a very challenging task but it can be done. Either 61% of the total track and field medals are to be won or a combination of medals in other sport events. Diversification in events is very important for Jamaica. Winning short distance running events by itself would not make it. Such events account for only 42 medals, almost half of what Jamaica would need to surpass the US.

    Olympic Development Programs – - 2012 FAMEO, 2016 FAMEO, 2020 FAMEO etc involved in identifying and developing youths are to be established in every Jamaican Town, Parish as well as at the National level. Apart from passion, hard work, dedication and discipline a lot of resources would be needed in running such programs. For example, resources are needed to establish and operate a National FAMEO Residence Program; train and pay coaches; provide stipends to athletes; organize periodic meets etc. As much as possible, the FAMEO activities are to be funded through private sources – - corporate sponsors and donations as well as individual donations. Unlike the US that does not fund any sport activity, the Jamaica government should provide matching funds to national athletic development programs. However, the focus and responsibility for the government should remain to be provision of good public education to our kids, building hospitals, providing security for its citizens and investment in public infrastructure. These are by far the most critical challenges in improving the standard of living and quality of life for this young and vibrant nation.

    Hope B. Gibson

    • September 25, 2009 at 8:48 am

      There appears to be an insistence to use quantitatve measurements such as medal tally to guage the success of the United States in track and field and on the other to disprove claims as to Jamaica’s ascendancy.

      My article did not once mention ‘medal tally’ or any kind of quantitative tests as that was not the premise on which I wanted to guage Jamaica’s ascendancy. Medal tally is a skwed and limited measurement of Jamaica’s growing authority i9n track and field and America’s decline.

      Jamaica ascendance is qualitative in terms of presence on the track for the alst 50 years or so relative to size, resources and sheer numbers of talent to emerge and occupy the field from heats to finals. The extraordinary looming presence of the nation in the consciousness of world athletics cannot be meaured by medal tally and ought not to be.

      So when you read my piece, read it with a sense of Jamaica’s presence (unlike any other nation even those with ore medals) and future promise, rather than its position on the medal table. Again quantitiave measurements could never prperly account for Jamaica’s success and America’s obvious decline in world athletics.